Jared
Schlosser, head of originations at Peachtree Group affiliate Stonehill, details
the benefits, best practices and bottom-line advantages of this increasingly
popular piece of the capital stack.
Hospitality investors need every capitalization tool at
their disposal to get deals done in today’s constrained lending environment.
For many smart developers, help has arrived in the form of Commercial Property
Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) lending, which provides real estate developers
and property owners with an innovative tool to finance renovations, conversions
or new construction.
C-PACE financing allows commercial property owners to obtain
low-cost, long-term financing for energy efficiency and renewable energy upgrades
to commercial buildings. The borrowed capital is repaid as a surcharge on the
project’s property taxes for up to 30 years.
“C-PACE allows lenders to issue loans on certain line items
and get repaid through property taxes,” said Jared Schlosser, head of
originations at Stonehill, a lender specializing in this form of financing. “Currently,
this program has been approved in 37 states, but since it is essentially a
legislative product, some elements differ from state to state, and those
differences can impact both the lending and borrowing sides of the equation.”
Schlosser explained that the terms for these private loans
are typically 20 to 30 years, fixed rate and non-recourse. “If a C-PACE loan is
in your capital stack, given that it's 7.5% to 8.5% fixed, it will lower your
cost of capital significantly in today's environment and provide a good source
of liquidity, replacing more expensive financing sources.”
Getting deals done
Developers have taken notice. This year Stonehill’s C-PACE
group has closed or is under contract with approximately $225 million in C-PACE
financing across 23 transactions that span most real estate sectors, including
hotels, multifamily, industrial and mixed-use. In addition, the C-PACE group
expects to deploy up to $400 million in 2023 for renewable energy and
energy-efficient components and seismic retrofitting. This fast-track growth
builds on continued momentum, with 65 deal closings in the last four years.
He credited the aggressive uptick in C-PACE volume since
2018-2019 to increased buy-in from the lending community. “A lot of different senior lenders have
consented. Generally, this group doesn’t want to be the first one to do
anything. So, the more lenders that consent to C-PACE, the greater the adoption,
which will lead to more deals and more acceptance,” he said.
Schlosser explained that the impetus for the launch of Stonehill’s
C-PACE group evolved from its effort to find ways to reduce the cost of capital
on the company’s construction lending side. Stonehill started offering the
product to marry up with its construction loans and make it more cost effective
for borrowers. Identifying broader
demand, the group saw opportunities to offer its expertise externally and work
with other lenders, fueling higher volume and a larger growth engine.
“It works well for ground-up construction in today's
environment, and it works really well for refinancing a project that's been
built in the last 36 month,” Schlosser said. “This is 7.5% to 8% money and most
of the states now allow for retroactive C-PACE. The borrower’s ability to get a
portion of stacked refinance through retroactive C-PACE in addition to
refinance proceeds might be the best way to refinance a project now.”
Mastering the process
The advantages of C-PACE funding are numerous. It’s a non-recourse
guarantee that's fully assumable, with a fixed rate, which is a plus in this
volatile rate environment. It's also a static payment, which is important for
underwriting. The challenges are primarily
how the other parts of the capital stack play along, according to Schlosser.
“Not every bank, construction lender, mezzanine lender or
preferred equity lender is going to consent to C-PACE,” Schlosser cautioned. “You've
got to be aware of how the other players you're putting out in that capital
stack will interact.”
Those concerns aside, the process is otherwise
straightforward. After determining whether the state the project is being done
in allows C-PACE lending, the developer submits a budget and summary of their
project to Stonehill. Schlosser’s team reviews that application, then informs
them of how much C-PACE funding they qualify for and provides help with sourcing
the remainder of the capital stack.
Terms vary state by state, but generally developers can
qualify for 30% to 35% of cost. The loan is fully funded at close and drawn
into the deal as line items that are collateralized or invoiced into the
project, and then paid back through property taxes. Stonehill generally
capitalizes from two to three years of interest and then starts
repayment after there’s a certificate of occupancy or some level of cash flow
at the hotel.
Optimizing the underwriting essentials
“Once you have that figured out, it's a very attractive
part. It all comes down to borrower strength; this is a pure underwriting
solution,” Schlosser said. “If your borrower’s strong and they have a strong
business plan and you have ample cash flow coverage to service the payments,
then it's really not a difficult thing to underwrite.”
The proof is in the projects. Stonehill’s C-PACE group has
been busier than ever, showing excellent year-over year-growth. This year the
group is on target to surpass more than $400 million in deployed financing. The lender believes use of this financing mechanism will only accelerate over
time and as familiarity grows. “The more support the hotel community gives in
terms of talking to legislators and their local groups about being involved and
pushing for legislation the better, because it's a cost-free incentive for the
state,” Schlosser said. “States have no reason not to allow C-PACE, and for
hotel owners, it could be the difference between getting a deal done or not in
that particular state.”
Brendan Manley is a writer, editor and digital marketer
specializing in hospitality content creation based in Warrensburg, New York
The views and opinions expressed in this column do not
necessarily reflect the opinions of Hotel Investment Today or Northstar Travel
Group and its affiliated companies.