At
the Web in Travel (WiT) event in Singapore, Pan Pacific’s CEO and a VP for
Booking.com discuss the “friend or foe” nature of their business relationship.
SINGAPORE — In the dance between
hotels and online travel agencies (OTAs), there’s a careful balance between
hotel companies enjoying the marketing involved in driving customers to their
properties and the desire to capture those customers and book them directly
going forward.
Choe Peng Su, CEO of
Singapore-based Pan Pacific Hotels Group and Laura Houldsworth, managing
director and vice president of Asia Pacific for Booking.com, had a “Face Off:
Friends, Foes or Fancy Partners” conversation at the Web in Travel (WiT) event
in Singapore last week that ranged on topics from loyalty programs to pricing
sensitivity.
Houldsworth shared Booking.com
internal research about how often their customers will book the same property
twice. The answer was only 2%.
“So, with that in mind, why do
you think so many of our chains, including yourself, would prefer a book-direct
strategy?” she asked.
Su said it’s easy for
booking.com, which has $20 billion-plus in annual revenue, to think of that 2%
as a “drop in the ocean,” but he pointed out that if you aggregate all of the
OTA bookings together, it can amount of almost 30% to 40% of the entire hotel sector
and as much as 15,000-20,000 room nights.
“Hotels want to go direct
booking because we want to keep our loyal customers,” Su said, mentioning that
Booking.com certainly isn’t going to share its database with hotel companies.
“With direct booking… we get to keep our database, we get to talk to our
customers and we get to enhance their experience.”
Su mentioned an example of Pan
Pacific’s loyalty program that, once customers reach the platinum or titanium
levels, their repeat stays rise dramatically, but “that’s only because we
engage them. We have the database. We touch base with them.”
He also mentioned that while
many hotel companies think of F&B as expensive, especially compared to room
revenue, the reality is that “F&B restaurants and bars create that kind of
special experience for the loyal guests. If you remember his birthday or you
remember his favorite drink, those small little things make a memorable
experience. And guess what? When we do that work, they’ll come back.”
Houldsworth mentioned that even
when customers book with OTAs, once the customer comes to the hotel, “they are
all yours.”
Su said he agreed and noted that
his company’s younger generation customers often prefer to book through OTAs.
He also noted OTAs’ key role in bringing new customers to hotels.
“If this is your first or second
or third time in a different country, you really want that whole spectrum of
comparison that you, that you and then reviews and all that,” he said. “So we
do coexist, and I think it’s a great synergy. It’s just that, you know, maybe
these hotels don’t really do a good job signing up loyal members.”
Benefiting from
‘expensive’ marketing
Houldsworth said there is a
perception that it’s expensive for hotels to work with OTAs, but those same
companies also benefit from massive marketing budgets.
“We looked at our individual
customers, and we are bringing travelers from over 180 customer country desk
locations booking on our platform…. So [a question for all hotel companies is]
how do you reach 180 countries? It’s very expensive marketing,” she said.
Su said he agreed and that the
amount of money OTAs spend on marketing is “amazing.”
“You guys are really, really
good at it,” he said. “You reach those countries, you bring them over, and
we’ll take over from there.”
Houldsworth said Booking.com
also wants its customers to book directly on its platform, especially with the
company’s “Genius” loyalty program.
“We obviously want travelers to
book directly the same way that you do, and we also want to lower our marketing
costs, but we also understand, without the search engines and all the different
sites, we also can’t do it,” she said.
Houldsworth said the company’s
loyalty programs have learned much about price sensitivity from customers who
travel a lot.
“It’s really about price. We
know customers are price-sensitive. They have a big range, so we want to ensure
that the right price is displayed,” she said. “We realized our ‘Genius’
customers are the frequent travelers, and then they bring significant value to
our partners because they typically are the ones that stay longer, potentially
pay more and don’t cancel as much.”
Houldsworth asked Su, with the
number of different channels available now for hotels to distribute, how do
hotel companies keep control of price?
Su said price strategy is
important because every customer doesn’t just come from one segment. “We concentrate on different
market segments. We look at what’s trending and we look at the history,” he
said. “Customers from different segments buy differently, are reached
differently and pay differently.”
Su noted the difference between
customers for corporate and those who prefer OTAs or MICE. “If we get pricing based on the
segmentation, we won’t cannibalize on each other,” he said.
Everyone is moving toward
dynamic pricing, Su said, but that often still won’t work for corporate
clients. “If the price is higher than the OTAs, it’s just driving the
corporates into OTAs, right?”