NATIONAL REPORT – Economic uncertainty, federal job cuts and
policy changes by the Trump administration pertaining to non-mandatory travel
are threatening to curtail growth momentum the U.S. lodging industry gained earlier
this year.
Despite projections from STR for RevPAR gains of roughly
1.8% in 2025, the U.S. lodging industry experienced robust 4.5% RevPAR growth
in January. However, those numbers have fluctuated wildly since then, ranging
from weekly gains of 3.4% to declines of 2.8% in February.
Led by the newly created DOGE (Department of Government
Efficiency), the Trump administration has vowed to slash some 10% of the
federal workforce with government employment falling by 10,000 in February
alone. In addition, an executive order now requires government agencies to
prohibit travel without written approval and for federal agencies to create a
system that records approval for federally funded travel for conferences and
other non-essential purposes.

Uncertainty and volatility about government policies, including funding and tariffs, are causing paralysis in the private sector as well as the government sector. That uncertainty is now affecting the market and the ability of businesses to plan causing a broader pause or wait-and-see approach.
Joseph Bojanowski
Joseph Bojanowski, president, Chevy Chase, Maryland-based PM
Hotel Group, insisted that some of these new polices and job cuts are among
several factors that will potentially hamper industry performance.
“The executive order will have a negative impact on
government transient travel and meeting and event travel. It further adds to
the already negative impact to government-related travel, and tourism-related
travel, as a result of the large-scale reduction of federal jobs, the decreased
support for travel infrastructure, such as national parks and monuments, and
the cancellation of conferences and events,” he said.
Larry Cuculic, president and CEO, Phoenix-based BWH Hotels,
reinforced the point from the perspective of a large brand company.
“Businesses like stability and predictability and any
policies that can impact the way you like to do business are always a
challenge. Fortunately, we’re a global company and the global economy continues
to show resilience and consumer confidence,” he told Hotel Investment Today.
Mitch Patel, founder/CEO, Vision Hospitality Group—and
current chair of the AHLA (American Hotel & Lodging Association)—also
acknowledged the influence of some of the policy changes.
“We’ve seen a huge impact at many of our hotels because of
these policy initiatives. It’s not across the board, but for those hotels that
relied on more government business that has tapered. We will definitely be
re-forecasting for lower occupancies and lower revenues,” Patel said.
Providing some tangible examples, Patel noted the
Chattanooga, Tennessee-based company’s portfolio includes several hotels
outside of Nashville “that were getting a tremendous amount of IRS training
business and that has been reduced down to almost zero.”
Patel further pointed out that the company’s Hyatt House
Denver/Aurora—located in close proximity to several large area hospitals—has
been affected by government grants that have been frozen.
Patel, however, did acknowledge the impact of the federal
policies is “very localized,” while estimating that government-related business
represents some 3% of the overall travel pie.
Meanwhile, the Washington, D.C. area is the U.S. market
likely to feel the greatest impact from the policy changes, according to
executives.
“One would think that the net impact of the layoffs will be
negative for the D.C. economy, in general, and have a cooling-off effect on the
demand growth experienced over the last years, as well as the growth forecasted
for 2025,” Bojanowski said.
Cuculic added, “Federal workforce reductions and travel
policies will create instability in the travel sector in regions with a high
concentration of government employees and contractors.”
Market by market
Jan Freitag, senior vice president of Lodging Insights, STR,
also acknowledged the potential impact regionally.

We’re seeing more of a 7- to 14-day booking window when it was a little bit more than that before. That’s not just from the government impact, but in general with corporate travel. So, it’s a little concerning to see that.
Mitch Patel
“Certainly, on the local level we expect impact in the
markets that have a large federal workforce, such as Kansas City, San Diego and
Washington, D.C., obviously,” he said, adding it is “way too early to tell”
what the impact would be on a national level in terms of overall performance.
A more detailed look at the numbers for the overall U.S.
lodging industry reveals that while January showed “really strong” RevPAR
growth of 4.5%, that can be somewhat misleading, according to Freitag. He cited
a handful of unique circumstances and events, such as the presidential
inauguration, the NCAA football finals in Atlanta, hurricane Helene, and the
wildfires in Los Angeles, all of which drove hotel demand up in January for a
handful of markets.
However, Freitag noted that outside of select markets RevPAR
growth was more along the lines of 2%, describing performance as more of a
“market-by-market” proposition.
In line with that, and some of the economic headwinds, Patel
noted the company’s projections for the year have changed.
“We felt like in ‘25 there was going to be a little bit more
certainty, but it’s safe to say now that we’re in March that there’s still a
lot of uncertainty,” he said.
That also translates to a change in booking patterns,
according to Patel, who further added that the company is “definitely seeing a
tighter booking window.”
He added, “We’re seeing more of a 7- to 14-day booking
window when it was a little bit more than that before. That’s not just from the
government impact, but in general with corporate travel. So, it’s a little
concerning to see that.”
“Booking windows have shortened or totally evaporated,” said
Bojanowski, adding that many groups have commonly requested the elimination of
cancellation fees as “funding is held up or approvals rescinded.”
Bojanowski spoke to the potential larger industry impact of
some of these changes.
“Uncertainty and volatility about government policies,
including funding and tariffs, are causing paralysis in the private sector as
well as the government sector. That uncertainty is now affecting the market and
the ability of businesses to plan causing a broader pause or wait-and-see
approach,” he concluded.