Experts
talk about the pace of refinance deals in 2025 and what the typical debt stack
looks like now.
Editor’s
note: Based on our perception of the increased volume of hotel refinances over
the past few months, Hotel Investment Today asked several brokers and debt
players about the state of the market. This is part 2 of a series that features
Charlie Ryan of Hunter Hotel Advisors and Mark Owens of Colliers. Click here
for Part 1. Click here for Part 2.
NATIONAL
REPORT — When we asked brokers and debt players in the hotel refinance market
why some refinance deals fail, they all said their main job is to set up a
situation where that doesn’t happen.
Still, they
tell us, some deals eventually fall through.
“Value erosion has occurred in a
number of markets, making refis more challenging,” said Charlie Ryan, senior
vice president of capital markets for Atlanta-based Hunter Hotel Advisors.
“Borrowers are forced to inject more equity, bring in a new capital partner, or
accept ‘rescue capital’ with hopes that time will right the ship.”
Mark Owens,
vice chair and leader of the hospitality practice group lead for Toronto-based
Colliers said leverage on some older vintage products that need capital can be
a constraint.
“We work
proactively with our clients to ensure that the capital stack matches what the
market will bear,” he said. “Some transactions may require additional equity
infusions, some may require a larger piece of subordinate capital, and others
may require a broader look at a portfolio and how to offset assets in need
versus those that may be better received by the market.”
And when
those refinance options become unavailable to a buyer, hotel financial experts
tell us a sale may end up being the best, or only, viable solution.
Hotel
Investment Today asked Ryan and Owens about the number of refinances they have
executed in 2025 compared to a year ago and what a typical debt stack looks
like these days.
Hotel
Investment Today (HIT): Have you completed more refinances in the first 3.5
months of 2025 than in the same period in 2024?
Charlie
Ryan: 2025 is off to
a stronger start than 2024. It’s worth noting that Hunter launched its Capital
Markets platform in January of last year, and since then, we’ve gained
significant traction. We closed a number of acquisitions and refis in 1Q25,
ranging from $5 to $35 million, with a strong pipeline leading into 2Q.
Mark
Owens: We have seen
our refinancing volume increase versus the same time last year and we
anticipate this trend to continue.
HIT: What
does the typical debt stack look like today on refinances?
Ryan: Most refis we are seeing are in the
65-70% range, with the senior going up to 70%. Above 70%, most mezz [preferred
equity] players want to write a $10 million-plus check. So, the overall deal
size needs to be on the larger end of the spectrum.

There are more lenders actively participating in each process, and thus we have more negotiating power on terms and conditions, both monetary and non-monetary. There is a rebound in the commercial bank market, both money center and regional.
Mark Owens
Owens: There is some LTV expansion, meaning
higher leverage available. The majority of the change, however, has been
the depth of the market for our offerings. There are more lenders actively
participating in each process, and thus we have more negotiating power on terms
and conditions, both monetary and non-monetary. There is a rebound in the
commercial bank market, both money center and regional.
HIT: What
is the main reason you see most of the refis?
Ryan: Most refis today are in response to
loan maturities, almost all of which will be refinancing into higher-rate
loans. These refis often come with PIP requirements, which can nudge the
borrower to consider a sale. Hunter is looking at a number of assets where the
sponsor is keeping all options on the table (sale or refi), which will
ultimately allow the markets to determine which path to take.
Owens: The majority of the refinancings are
driven either by maturities or the desire to repatriate equity while also
retaining an income stream after debt service.
HIT: Can you
offer an example of a typical (or atypical) deal with rate structure/terms for
a recently closed refi?
Ryan: One unique refi we recently
completed was on a zero cash-flow deal in a major MSA. Most lenders were
converging around SOFR +400, with three outliers competing in the S+300 range.
We ultimately closed at S+250.
Owens: The balance sheet market, for
example, continues to be active in cash-flowing transactions, with spreads now
in the 200s for quality assets and sponsorship.
HIT: Where are
interest rates trending today and what are your expectations for the next 90
days?
Ryan: Rates, specifically spreads, were on
a nice downward trajectory until the tariffs went into effect in early April.
Since that time, we have felt spreads widen slightly, and/or lenders show some
hesitation in quoting until the dust settles. Our belief is there will be some
pockets (geographically) where lenders will pull back, but there is still
plenty of capital chasing quality deals, continuing a compression of spreads.

Our belief is there will be some pockets (geographically) where lenders will pull back, but there is still plenty of capital chasing quality deals, continuing a compression of spreads.
Charlie Ryan
Owens: The markets are constantly evolving
right now and we are closely monitoring the benchmarks and broader economic
indicators. Recent volatility caused some spread expansion for levered
debt funds and the SASB market. Having options in this market is essential in
order to maintain pricing. Barring any unforeseen event, we expect to be able
to negotiate spreads and/or non-economic terms more aggressively than 90 to 180
days ago.
HIT: What
entities are most active in the debt market right now (private, regional banks,
CMBS, alternative)? Are there any trends in who will provide more capital in
2025?
Ryan: All capital providers are more
active now than they were 12-24 months ago. There are more alternative lenders
in the hospitality space than ever, and CMBS/LifeCo debt functions efficiently
in the current environment. We anticipate alternative lenders to continue
capturing market share with their higher leverage options, while regional banks
will continue offering the best pricing if recourse/deposit structures are
available.
Owens: Fortunately, all of the lender groups
are active today, which creates a variety of options. We will see a dramatic
increase in the bank market, CMBS continues to be an interesting alternative
given the pricing power in this market, as well as lower costs to close.