During
the company’s first-quarter earnings call last week, CEO Geoff Ballotti said
Wyndham is better positioned to outperform its competitors in times of economic
downturns.
PARSIPPANY, New Jersey — If a
recession is coming, Wyndham says historical performance is on its side.
“Whatever demand scenario may transpire, our brands
have always outperformed in periods of economic downturn relative to the
overall industry,” said Wyndham Hotels & Resorts President and CEO Geoff
Ballotti, who mentioned the company’s strong performance after 9/11, after the
Great Recession and during COVID, in his opening statement during the company’s
first-quarter earnings call on Thursday.
Ballotti said the company’s
track record of outperforming the industry during economic downturns isn’t
coincidental.
“It reflects the structural
advantages of our select-service model and the nature of the demand that we
serve with limited reliance on white-collar corporate and group travel, which
tends to contract most during economic downturns,” he said.
Wyndham announced last week that
it opened a first-quarter record 14,800 rooms, representing a 13%
year-over-year increase, but it also cut 2025 guidance more than expected.
Wyndham adjusted its full-year
2025 RevPAR guidance from +2-3% to -2% to +1%. The company said the updated
range “reflects a variety of potential outcomes for the remainder of the year,
from a more optimistic scenario in which the softness seen in March and April
proves to be temporary, to a more cautious view that contemplates persistent
pressure on demand throughout the remainder of the year.”
For several reasons, Ballotti
said his team is still optimistic about the rest of 2025, even with a potential
recession.
“Our businesses are anchored by
a stable and resilient base of essential frontline blue-collar workers, a guest
segment that continues to drive consistent demand, even as broader corporate
discretionary travel budgets tighten,” he said. “This segment has shown
resilience through prior cycles, and we expect it to do the same in any
macroeconomic setup.”
Ballotti also said Wyndham isn’t
as impacted as other hotel companies with a decrease in international inbound
(less than 3% of its bookings come from international inbound, including less
than 2% from Canada).
“Approximately 90% of our
footprint is concentrated in drive-to markets where leisure demand is less
impacted by the cost and the complexity of air travel,” he said.
Wyndham is often a beneficiary
of trade-down demand from leisure and business travel.
“We outperform in times of
economic distress because our model is different. During economic down cycles,
we’ve continued to grow our system amid softer demand environments,” he said.
The company made slight downward
adjustments to its other 2025 guidance but didn’t change its year-over-year
room growth estimate of 3.6% to 4.6%.
“Our continued momentum on the
development front speaks volumes, reflecting not only the strength of our value
proposition to owners but also the confidence they have in our ability to
perform in any range of market conditions,” Ballotti said. “We’ve been
here before and each time, we’ve stayed grounded in what we do best, growing
our system, supporting our franchisees and advancing the strategic initiatives
that strengthen our business over time, which is exactly what we’re focused on
doing right now.”
.png?tr=w-780%2Cfo-auto)
Wyndham said demand in China is steady (like at the Wyndham Grand Shanxi Xiaohe Xincheng), but RevPAR declined 8% YOY.
Other Q1 highlights
- The company said global RevPAR
grew 2% in constant currency YOY, reflecting 2% growth in the U.S. and 3%
internationally. In the U.S., RevPAR growth included 100 basis points of
benefit from hurricanes and the timing of the Easter holiday. Excluding those
factors, Wyndham’s U.S. RevPAR grew 60 bps YOY.
- Wyndham said that RevPAR
growth was strongest internationally in the EMEA (+6% YOY) and Latin America
(+25% YOY). The company said demand remained steady in China, but RevPAR
declined 8% YOY.
- Through Q1, system-wide net
rooms growth was 4%, including 1% growth in the U.S. and 7% growth
internationally.
- Wyndham’s global pipeline
included approximately 2,140 hotels and 254,000 rooms, which included 5% growth
in the U.S. and 4% internationally. Approximately 77% of the pipeline is new
construction, with 35% of those projects already having broken ground.
- The company awarded 181
development contracts globally, an increase of 6% YOY.
- Fee-related and other revenues
increased 4% YOY.
- Net income of $61 million
compared to $16 million in Q124; adjusted net income increased 5% YOY to $67
million.
- Adjusted EBITDA increased 3%
year-over-year to $145 million, or 9% on a comparable basis
- Fee-related and other revenues
grew 4% to $316 million, which reflects higher royalties and franchise fees and
higher ancillary revenues
- Wyndham returned $109 million
to shareholders through $76 million of share repurchases and quarterly cash
dividends of $0.41 per share
What analysts said
Analyst Michael Bellisario of
R.W. Baird said the first quarter results matched expectations but the 2025
guidance was “cut a bit more than expected, which could pressure [Wyndham]
shares near-term.”
“Global RevPAR growth was +2%,
which was below our +3% estimate on slower U.S. trends, particularly in March,”
he said. “Earnings – adjusted for greater marketing/reservation/loyalty
over-spend during the quarter – were in line with Baird/Street expectations. In
our view, the bigger focus will be the full-year guidance reduction, which was
a bit bigger than expected. Adjusted EBITDA estimates likely will come down ~1%
for 2025E.”
Analyst Patrick Scholes of
Truist Securities said Wyndham’s earnings were a miss partly driven by
marketing fund variability.
“RevPAR
guidance being lowered is not a surprise at this moment. Similar to Hilton, we
believe the low-end of guidance is the more likely scenario. We are also not
surprised to see net rooms growth guidance maintained, though we believe
pressure will show up in 2026/2027,” he said. “Importantly for [Wyndham],
declines in RevPAR are relatively less impactful to EBITDA due to its pure
asset-lite franchise model.”