In response to a court settlement in 2021, by mid-May Marriott will be the first to respond to consumer pressure with upfront full rates on its website and app.
NATIONAL REPORT – Marriott International in mid-May is going to prominently display
on its website and mobile app rates inclusive of resort or destination fees,
according to multiple reports. Marriott is making this required moved based on
a 2021 settlement in a Pennsylvania court regarding resort fees as a deceptive
practice. Call center agents will also have to quote prices inclusive of fees.
Now the question becomes how quickly other hotels, hotel
companies and online travel agents will follow suit before similarly pursued by states. As of now, OTAs such as Expedia can show Marriott rates with resort fees displayed much less prominently.
Marriott issued a statement on Monday afternoon: “Marriott
International is committed to providing customers with clear and transparent
pricing. We have long been focused on ensuring that any resort/destination fees
charged by hotels are separately and clearly stated. We have been working
diligently over the last several months on the technology required to update
our room rate display and further enhance the way these fees are disclosed, in
accordance with our agreement with the State of Pennsylvania. In fact, when we
deploy our changes by May 15, 2023, we expect to be the first hospitality
company to change its display, leading the industry on this important
issue."
During Tuesday's 1Q earnings call, Marriott President and CEO Tony Capuano added, "We've already been showing it [additional fees]. The discussions
we've been having with the various various jurisdictions are just about making
sure that the transparency of those disclosures are enhanced and crystal
clear for our guests," he said. "It is not as if those were hidden somehow. And we're simply
further clarifying and enhancing that transparency. I will leave it to the
state agencies around the rest of the country for the rest of the industry. But
I am pleased that we will lead the industry in terms of the transparency of our
disclosure for our guests."
Hotel Investment Today reached out to industry insiders for comment with asset manager Michelle Russo of New York City-based HotelAVE saying, "We will be monitoring
rate parity via meta searches (think Kayak) to confirm that these searches will
pull the non-member rates from Marriott.com versus Marriott rates from the other booking channels as well as whether the change
in presentation of rates on Marriott.com results in any reduction in demand from the brand.com source. We expect that others will follow suit as there is a government desire
to address this issue holistically and not just for one company."
Trevor
Stuart-Hill of revenue management firm Revenue
Matters, Englewood, Colorado, added, "While
this may be helpful for potential guests who shop based on price alone, it will
have a knock-on effect for the industry that may make booking travel more
arduous (and likely more expensive) in the future."
Stuart-Hill said quality
properties have always resisted commoditization, particularly since the
mid-90’s as OTA’s emerged. "OTA’s are rewarded for driving transactional
volume and have historically used price as the primary lever to do so. Articulating the value proposition for a guest is more readily
accomplished through proprietary channels such as the property‘s own website or
call center. It is much more challenging to accomplish this through third-party channels such as OTAs or legacy GDS systems.
The
consequences for consumers are numerous, said Stuart-Hill, and include confusion resulting from a
potential departure from perceived rate parity across channels. "Properties are
likely to be forced to move towards unbundling rates where valuable elements
are stripped and individual components will need to be repurchased at a premium
to reach the same original level of offering," Stuart-Hill said. "Why? If loyalty members have
access to rates that include value-add features, they will need to trust that
the value they receive from these packaged components is greater than what they
would have paid if they purchased these components individually."
He continued by stating that the
airline industry serves as a good example of how unbundled pricing has been
received by travel arrangers and the traveling public.