Number
crunchers and tree huggers may seem strange bedfellows, but more companies like
CapitaLand are putting sustainability with finance. Will it take off in
hospitality?
SINGAPORE – Integrating
sustainability with finance could be a game-changer for corporate performance
as the two functions have become more inter-independent and are mutually
beneficial with the rise of ESG.
CFOs
and sustainability chiefs may disagree, but the reality is companies are
starting to combine the two roles.
Already,
finance leads the sustainability agenda at 20% of companies, according to
Boston Consulting Group’s CFO Excellence Index. And these firms scored on
average 9 points higher in the index’s climate and sustainability performance
benchmarking than companies that have other functions lead the agenda.
The
index covers a broad set of industries globally and not hospitality
specifically.
In
the global hotel industry, it is clear that hotel chains, especially the larger
ones, have moved to appoint chief sustainability officers ever since ESG rose
to prominence over the last few years. Others place the function under
operations, human resource, procurement, investor relations or public
relations. But a c-suite hospitality executive that wears a hat combining
finance and sustainability is still a rarity.

The voice and authority of a CFO helps in messaging the importance of sustie [short form for sustainability] at the leadership level. This creates an overarching emphasis and priority for sustainability. It drives the agenda at most of our management meetings. In the past, sustainability was a subset of many agendas.
Siew Kim Beh
That
makes Siew Kim Beh, chief financial and sustainability officer (CFSO), Lodging,
at CapitaLand Investment, an exception. The Singapore-based company’s lodging
business, The Ascott, currently has more than 600 open properties globally
under several brands, including the eponymous Ascott, Citadines, Oakwood and
Somerset.
“From my experience, indeed the
role is an anomaly, in a good way. A CFO with glamour, and a mandate and
passion for sustainability – I’ve not seen that anywhere and greatly welcome
and respect it,” said Randy Durband, CEO, Global Sustainable Tourism Council
(GSTC).
Lethal
combination
Slightly
more than a year into the role, Beh believes that finance and sustainability
are a “lethal combination.”
“CFOs
are involved in most business decision making and therefore work with more of
the leaders in the organization,” she said. “The voice and authority of a CFO
helps in messaging the importance of sustie [short form for sustainability] at
the leadership level. This creates an overarching emphasis and priority for
sustainability. It drives the agenda at most of our management meetings. In the
past, sustainability was a subset of many agendas.”
Beh
isn't advocating that every organization should have a CFSO but for her, once
she was put onto the green drive, it became a cause, not cost.
“The
issue is most organizations still think sustainability is a cost. I wear a
different lens to this,” she said. “When all your different stakeholders expect
you as an organization and service provider to be sustainable, to me, that’s a
business consideration, meaning, if I don’t do anything about it, then
inevitably my revenue and my top line will be affected. Then it becomes a loss
of business and a cost to me.”
Before
the role she was CEO of CapitaLand Ascott Trust for more than five years,
working with the capital and debt markets. Financiers, lenders and investors
began asking her what she’s doing about sustainability for her portfolio. When
she was moved to the lodging business as part of a regular leadership renewal
process, CapitaLand Investment CEO, Lodging, Kevin Goh, noted her enthusiasm
for sustainability; the rest is history.
Other
CFOs may feel less inclined towards sustainability, which may be a barrier to
combined positions such as a CFSO. But Beh said, “I was not the ‘green person’
per se, to be honest. I was driven by the fact it’s important for the business.
So, I started learning about sustainability, embracing it and getting others to
do so. Then I realized that, hey, I’m making an impact for our planet and
future generations, and it became a cause.
“I
know that for some people or departments doing sustainability, it feels like
additional work. But our people started texting me or telling me they really
enjoy doing it and that is very satisfying for me,” she said.
ROI
of a CFSO
The
sustainability function at Ascott was previously absorbed by the global
operations team. Now, there’s a formal structure, starting with a Sustainable
Leadership Council co-led by the CEO and CSFO. The council determines
sustainability strategies and goals and is supported by an Ascott
Sustainability Department which drives implementation.

Ascott Maranouchi Tokyo lobby
At
each of the 40-plus countries where Ascott has a footprint, and at every
property level, there’s a Sustainability Working Committee and a Sustainability
Champion.
So,
has there been an increase in sustainability budget since she took on the
role?
“I
wouldn’t say we are spending more, but we are doing a lot more. There’s a lot
of low hanging fruits, such as eliminating single use plastic or reducing waste
and energy; it does not always have to be capex,” she said. “It is getting our
people to think: what sustainable initiatives can they do at property level
without causing them any more money? When you set targets for them, they become
creative. People generally want to be engaged and to be contributing.”
A
bi-monthly sustainability online meeting sees 700 employees on average logging
in. “It shows how interested they are in learning from one another. It
motivates them and they even become competitive about it,” exclaimed Beh.
It’s
unavoidable that capex is needed for other initiatives, big ones such as achieving
green building certification for owned properties, or smaller ones such as
installing sensors that switch off all electricity when guests leave the room.
But she said given factors such as improved technology and lower costs, payback
has been bigger and faster.
“Electricity
costs were 30% less in one of our properties in the U.K. which recently
installed the sensors,” she said.
Getting
owners on board
Ascott
aims to be asset light, doubling management fee revenues to more than S$500
million in the next five years, which means the challenge of persuading owners
to be green looms ahead.

We’re also putting a clause on new contracts requiring owners to abide by our green certification requirements – we have the expertise to guide them on how to do it. Of course, it’s always a conversation and is subject to negotiation, but we have the buy-in from our development people to work with owners on this. It’s also a process of educating owners that green buildings also command a premium on the real estate.
Siew Kim Beh
“This
is a reason why we implement sustainability initiatives at our assets first. We
could show owners how those efforts can help reduce their operational costs,
for instance,” Beh said. “We’re also putting a clause on new contracts
requiring owners to abide by our green certification requirements – we have the
expertise to guide them on how to do it. Of course, it’s always a conversation
and is subject to negotiation, but we have the buy-in from our development
people to work with owners on this. It’s also a process of educating owners
that green buildings also command a premium on the real estate.”
Ascott
aims to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Last year’s highlights include a 12%
to 13% reduction in carbon emissions intensity and energy intensity, and a 7%
drop over 2019 in water intensity. However, these results were also due to
reduced activity at some properties during COVID-19.
Ascott
also received GSTC Recognized Standard status. Nearly 35% of its owned
properties were green-building certified, putting it on target to reach 100% by
2030.
Go further?
The CFSO role could be the
start, or a good example, of linking executive pay to not just financial performance
but sustainability goals.
Mario Hardy, managing director
of Gibraltar-based Map2Ventures, a private fund focusing on impact investing in
FinTech, GreenTech and AI sectors, observed that a gap has opened between pay
and purpose in most c-suites.
“Most
top teams are incentivized against short-term financial performance, which
differs from organizational purpose statements that typically reflect
aspirational long-term financial and non-financial goals,” Hardy said.
Hardy
is fully supportive of linking executive pay to both financial and
sustainability goals.
“As
with any goals, they should be clearly defined with tangible and measurable
targets; they should also be short-, medium- and long-term,” he said. “If we
want humanity and our planet to survive, we all have to contribute to make this
world a better place to live for future generations. That means tourism
businesses also need to play their part.”